truth1one писал(а): такой разницы мы уже давно честно говоря не наблюдали
В сонебойском мирке много чего "не наблюдается"

.
http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head/ve ... -analysis/
GR A P H I C S
The deciding factor here was the Xbox 360 version had a more robust lighting system with the addition of SSAO. Although the texture quality between the two looked to be on par, the Xbox 360 version look more polished throughout. Xbox 360 - Win
P E R F O R M A N C E
Xbox 360 win: Having less screen tearing, the Xbox 360 out performs the PlayStation 3 version in this category. To recap, the PlayStation 3 version had 8.3% screen tearing, while the Xbox 360 held it to a minimum of 2.7%. Xbox 360 - Win
L O A D I N G
Xbox 360 win: Although the PlayStation 3 version did not require an install, the Xbox 360 version had half the load times of the PlayStation 3 version. Maybe a mandatory install would have worked this time around, or maybe not? Xbox 360 - Win
O U T C O M E
Win Xbox 360 wins this Head2Head by out performing the PlayStation 3 version as well as having half the load times. Add to that a more robust lighting system and SSAO, the Xbox 360 version walks away with this one.
O M M E N T S C H O I C E
At first I though the PlayStation 3 version had the graphics in the bag, but I was wrong. The Xbox 360’s lighting really started to show its superiority when exposed to outdoor environments. No doubt, Xbox 360 wins this one hands down. Xbox 360 - Win
Shawn “…I was wrong…”
Well the evidence is overwhelming here, the Xbox 360 version definitely has the advantage here in every category. Faster load times, better lighting (with SSAO) and better performance. No brainer, Xbox 360 version all the way. Xbox 360 - Win
Jaime “…No brainer, Xbox 360 all the way…”
While both versions look somewhat similar to one another, it is the screen tearing that seals the deal. With faster load times, superior SSAO, and better overall performance, the 360 is the way to go for me.
